A Rare Performance of a Mozart Curiosity

Alliance Francaise.  Bangkok, Thailand.  February 17, 2013.  Mozart wrote incidental music to a play called “Thamos King of Egypt,” which was played only a few times during his lifetime, and practically never thereafter.  It is a curiosity, one that I was happy to have an opportunity to hear.  This performance was by 17-year old music students from Mahidol University, who formed the orchestra, chorus and soloists.  It was not very well done, but one has to admire these students for the effort they made, knowing that they will improve in the future.

Greek Music at the TPO

Mahidol University has a program of inviting school children from upcountry,  to spend a weekend on campus and to participate in music activities.  This group of adorable 5^th graders were waiting to attend the TPO concert.  I sat next to them and they were perfectly behaved.

MACM Hall. Mahidol University. Nakonpathom. Thailand. February 9, 2013. The Thailand Philharmonic Orchestra is adept at selecting unknown music from both known and unknown composers. In its "Greek Music" program, guest conductor Alkis Baltas chose an obscure oboe concerto from the very famous Richard Strauss, and a ballet suite from the unknown Greek composer Nikos Skalkottas (1904-1949). The oboe concerto was played by the young French oboist, Philippe Tondre, who made about as much as one could from this strange sounding work. Although unmistakably Strauss, the oboe is not the most attractive instrument to listen to over a prolonged period of time, and this concerto is more an oddity than anything else.

French oboist Philippe Tandre after his performance of Richard Strauss’ oboe concerto.

Greek composer Nikos Skalkottas perhaps would get a footnote in an history of 20^th century music, but I found his "The Sea" ballet suite for orchestra, a beautiful and lush work of many moods over its eleven short movements. It was a perfect piece for the TPO to show off its many ensembles, as well as the robust sound of the full orchestra. I downloaded The Sea and will enjoy listening to it again.

Is the Press Free in Thailand?

Sukanya Pruksakasemsuk, wife of jailed editor Somyot Pruksakasemsuk, provided details about the conduct of the trial that resulted in her husband being jailed for 10 years.

Foreign Correspondents Club of Thailand. Bangkok. January 31, 2013. Freedom of speech and of the press are seriously constrained in Thailand. Although a democracy in form, the country harbors many undemocratic practices. In a recent report, Reporters without Borders ranked freedom of expression in Thailand below most of the world, placing it 135^th out of 179 countries ranked, below such countries as Afghanistan and Libya. 

Pphoto left to right  Sukanya Pruksakasemsuk, wife of Somyot Pruksakasemsuk;
- Dr. Tul Sittisomwong, leader of the "multicoloured shirt" group;
- David Streckfuss, noted scholar of lèse-majesté legislation, and author of Truth on Trial in Thailand;
- Chiranuch Premchaiporn, Director, Prachatai.com

The case of a news magazine editor who was just sentenced to 10 years in jail for an article appearing in his journal, which he did not even author, has drawn renewed attention to the issue of press freedom in Thailand, and has been condemned by the UN, the EU and the US, among others. The panel discussion at the FCCT about this recent case and the laws used to suppress freedom of expression, was attended by a packed house. It was not the first such panel on this very subject that I've attended. The following news report from the Bangkok Post, is a very accurate report of the proceedings at the FCCT on January 31.

 
Bangkok Post February 3, 2013 
The discussion, held at the Foreign Correspondents Club of Thailand on Thursday, was a deeply personal one for those in attendance, particularly Sakanya Prueksakasemsuk, the wife of Somyot who was sentenced late last month to 10 years in prison for publishing two articles deemed insulting to the monarchy. Also on the panel was Chiranuch Premchaiporn, director of Prachathai.com, who had her own experience with the law after being handed a suspended sentence last year for lese majeste-related charges under the Computer Crime Act.

The tone of the event veered from the personal and emotional to a more academic discussion of the specifics of the law, its interpretation and enforcement in a rapidly changing society.
 
Mrs Sukanya said that the articles published by her husband in his Voice of Taksin magazine did not mention His Majesty the King and there was no intent to defame the monarchy. She pointed out also that under the Printing Act of 2007 writers, not publishers, are legally accountable for material. In Somyot's case the court ruled that the Printing Act did not apply to lese majeste offences.
 
Chiranuch compared her own trial with that of Somyot. She was charged under Articles 14 and 15 of the Computer Crime Act (which defer to the Criminal Code), while Somyot was charged under Article 112. Both Chiranuch and Somyot were charged over material written by someone else _ in the Prachathai.com director's case for comments posted on the website's forum. Chiranuch also recounted how like Somyot she had been apprehended at an immigration checkpoint.
 
However, she said, the similarities ended there. Somyot was presented at court in heavy shackles, transported hundreds of kilometres to various provinces for hearings headed by several different judges and allowed only limited access to family and lawyers. Chiranuch was allowed bail and had unhindered access to lawyers and family.
 
She suggested that the different treatment the two received was because of an attempt to dehumanise Somyot.
 
Tul Sittisomwong, leader of the so-called multilcoloured shirt group, told the forum that it was inappropriate to look at the lese majeste issue from the perspective of human rights and free expression. Understanding the political context is crucial, he said.
 
While Mrs Sukanya had defended her husband as never having intended to offend the monarchy, Dr Tul argued that red shirt stage rhetoric had become so inflammatory that it was clear they desired a new state no longer defined as a constitutional monarchy. Somyot had been a prominent voice of that movement, he said.
 
David Streckfuss, lese majeste scholar and author of Truth on Trial in Thailand, compared Thailand's application of the law to that in Europe. Constitutional monarchies there _ in Norway, Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands and Spain _ have lese majeste laws that include jail sentences of up to five years. The difference, Mr Streckfuss said, was that these laws are rarely enforced in these countries. Courts in these countries are aware that overzealous enforcement is likely to have the opposite effect to the intended preservation of the monarchy. Applying it for political ends would have a similarly negative effect.
 
The articles that sent Somyot to prison for 10 years are believed to have been penned by former PM's Office Minister Jakrapob Penkair under the pseudonym of Jit Polachan in the February and March 2010 editions of the Voice of Taksin magazine. (Jakrapob was never charged in connection with the articles). Both offending articles use ambiguous language and have an allegorical tone, though their publication in the red shirt-affiliated publication leaves little room for doubt that they were politically motivated.
 
Prosecution witnesses included two librarians who gave their interpretations of the texts. Their testimony was given pre-eminence by the judges.
 
The issue of interpretation in regards to whether material falls foul of lese majeste laws was also raised by a Matichon reporter who said that the newspaper's website had posted a poem on its website to honour HM the King. The poem raised the ire of several dozen royalists who interpreted it as offensive. The grey area surrounding interpretation and intent posed a challenge in the application of the law.
 
Others at the FCCT event also raised the point that what people post on Twitter and Facebook, usually intended only for a small group of friends or followers, can now be raised before the courts. Statements without any intention to defame the highest institution can be interpreted as politically subversive in such instances.
 
Aside from the complexities surrounding the law's enforcement, there is no doubt that the number of lese majeste cases has rocketed since the 2006 coup. Prior to that, in the 30 years following the October tragedy in 1976 at Thammasat University, the law was only ever applied sporadically.
 
Dr Tul said the escalation was proof of a movement to undermine the Thai state and its institutions, while Mr Streckfuss suggested it was due to a political and military will to preserve the status quo.
 
Chiranuch said the increase might be due to the injustice of one conviction leading to greater resistance to the law, leading to more charges, in turn sparking greater resistance.
 
Dr Tul has come out in favour of some amendments to Article 112 and its implementation, however he insisted that the law was as vital to Thai society as prohibitions against murder or drug trafficking. Like those laws, lese majeste cases serve to remind the public about what acceptable behaviour is in society. Somyot's case, he argued should be seen as a necessary action to protect the state and its institutions against a movement intent on undoing them. To repeal Article 112 would be tantamount to pulling out the foundations of Thai society.
 
Despite the increased number of successfully prosecuted lese majeste cases, Mr Streckfuss said there was room for optimism.
 
When delivering its verdict in Somyot's case, the chief judge of the Criminal Court Thawee Prachuablarb gave the reasons behind the decision. ''The court's procedure showed the articles which Mr Somyot published did not contain academic views of the monarchy. The articles were insulting in nature.''
 
The clarification helped give citizens and those in media and publishing a clearer idea of what is acceptable regarding the public discussion of the lese majeste law, Mr Streckfuss said. 

 

TPO is a Bright Exception to the Dismal Bangkok Classical Music Scene

Hungarian duo guitarists, the Katona Twins, meet the public after their performance with the TPO.

MACM Hall.  College of Music Mahidol University. Nakompathom, Thailand.  January 26, 2013.  The classical music scene in Thailand’s capital city has been deteriorating over the years and can only be described as dismal.  The decreasing number of events are held in mostly makeshift venues, before small, appreciative but ill-behaved audiences of both Thais and foreigners, with uneven and irrational ticket pricing, and performances that are often not representative of the abundant great talent and superb teaching that exists in the country.  An exception to this discouraging picture is the Thailand Philharmonic Orchestra, which maintains a full season of exciting programming, which it performs in an auditorium which was specifically designed as a concert hall.  The members of the orchestra are comprised of both faculty members and students at the College of Music of Mahidol University, under an excellent permanent conductor, Gudni Emilsson, whose tenure has shaped the sound and performance standards of the orchestra, and several excellent guest conductors.  This orchestra sounds good.

“From Piazzolla to Sibelius,” is a good example of a typical TPO program.  It began, as usual, with an orchestral arrangement of a fast tempo traditional Thai song, which usually sound similar to a Boston Pops arrangement of an American standard.  It’s a nice way to begin a program.  I wish that the TPO would make a CD of these arrangements because many of them would be worth repeated hearings.

A guitar duo from Hungary, the Katana Twins, played two 20^th century works for two guitars, the Double Concerto for two Guitars and Orchestra by the Argentinean composer Astor Piazzolla, and Concerto Madrigal for two Guitars and Orchestra by the Spanish composer Joaquin Rodrigo.  Both works were unknown to me and, I suspect, most of the audience, but they were interesting to hear and sometimes haunting.  Confidentially played by these excellent soloists, they found sympathetic support from the orchestra lead by Italian guest conductor Alfonso Scarano.  I especially liked the Piazzolla, which, scored for strings and a few winds, showed just how good the TPO’s strings are, which often get crowded out by the orchestra’s brass.  The encore was an arrangement by the twins of a well-known Vivaldi sonata.  Although its resemblance to the original Vivaldi was unrecognizable, it didn’t have to be:  Liszt was a master of taking an opera or orchestral fragment, and using it to create a work which stood by itself and paid only lip service to its origin.

The second half of the program was devoted to a passionate performance of Symphony No 1 by Jean Sibelius, a work I haven’t listened to in many years.  During his long lifetime, Sibelius was a controversial composer.  “…he was lionized in America and dismissed as a kitsch composer in the taste-making Austro-German music centers.”  (“The Rest is Noise,” by Alex Ross, p. 171.)  His Symphony No. 1 shows that he is much more than a composer of nationalistic works (e.g., Finlandia) from small nations and one can hear a lot more in this sometimes strange symphony than forest murmurs from Finland.  Unfortunately for this otherwise excellent performance, the score made clear the major problem faced by the TPO---a lack of strings---which results in the brass overpowering the strings and unbalancing the orchestra, which no amount of adjusting can totally cure.  More string players please.